Ham Bridge


Heritage Category:
Scheduled Monument
List Entry Number:
Date first listed:


© Crown Copyright and database right 2021. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100024900.
© British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Limited 2021. All rights reserved. Licence number 102006.006.
Use of this data is subject to Terms and Conditions.

The above map is for quick reference purposes only and may not be to scale. For a copy of the full scale map, please see the attached PDF - 1005265.pdf

The PDF will be generated from our live systems and may take a few minutes to download depending on how busy our servers are. We apologise for this delay.

This copy shows the entry on 23-Jun-2021 at 04:09:11.


The building or site itself may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.

Malvern Hills (District Authority)
Clifton upon Teme
Malvern Hills (District Authority)
National Grid Reference:
SO 73725 61091


Ham Bridge 320m north west of Hambridge Farm.

Reasons for Designation

Multi-span bridges are structures of two or more arches supported on piers. They were constructed from the medieval period for the use of pedestrians and packhorse or vehicular traffic, crossing rivers or streams, often replacing or supplementing earlier fords. Most stone or brick bridges were constructed with pointed arches, although semicircular and segmental examples are also known. The bridge abutments and revetting of the river banks also form part of the bridge. Despite partial remodelling and the insertion of a road surface, Ham Bridge survives comparatively well and contains a number of architectural features of considerable interest.


See Details.


This record was the subject of a minor enhancement on 19 May 2015. This record has been generated from an "old county number" (OCN) scheduling record. These are monuments that were not reviewed under the Monuments Protection Programme and are some of our oldest designation records.

This monument includes a multi span bridge situated across the River Teme south east of Clifton-Upon-Teme. The monument survives as a three-span bridge with additional overflow channels at the north eastern and south western ends. The bridge was constructed in the 17th century and was remodelled during the 18th and 20th centuries. The bridge is approximately 22m long and up to 9m wide and is constructed from stone with red brick arches with some concrete and iron. The bridge has ten iron corbals situated below a very low stone parapet surmounted by a balustrade of iron railings. The railings are divided by eight square iron pillars with stepped pagoda caps. Two brick and stone piers separate three arches spanning the river. The arches have segmental heads and keystones and the central arch is the widest. Both sides of the bridge have pointed cut waters at the base of the piers either side of the central arch. The north western cut waters extend approximately 1m from the bridge and the south eastern cut waters are stepped and project up to 3m from the bridge. Shallow buttresses rise up from the cut waters to the parapet.

The original bridge was constructed by the Mortimer’s of Wigmore who were large property holders in the Teme Valley. The name of the bridge is taken from Ham Castle, one of the Mortimer’s other properties situated to the north west.


The contents of this record have been generated from a legacy data system.

Legacy System number:
WT 320
Legacy System:


Pastscape Monument No:- 114230


This monument is scheduled under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 as amended as it appears to the Secretary of State to be of national importance. This entry is a copy, the original is held by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.

End of official listing

Your Contributions

Do you know more about this entry?

The following information has been contributed by users volunteering for our Enriching The List project. For small corrections to the List Entry please see our Minor Amendments procedure.

The information and images below are the opinion of the contributor, are not part of the official entry and do not represent the official position of Historic England. We have not checked that the contributions below are factually accurate. Please see our terms and conditions. If you wish to report an issue with a contribution or have a question please email [email protected].