Maple Hayes moated site

Overview

Heritage Category:
Scheduled Monument
List Entry Number:
1009054
Date first listed:
10-Jul-1969
Date of most recent amendment:
30-Dec-1992

Map

Ordnance survey map of Maple Hayes moated site
© Crown Copyright and database right 2019. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100024900.
© British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Limited 2019. All rights reserved. Licence number 102006.006.
Use of this data is subject to Terms and Conditions.

The above map is for quick reference purposes only and may not be to scale. For a copy of the full scale map, please see the attached PDF - 1009054 .pdf

The PDF will be generated from our live systems and may take a few minutes to download depending on how busy our servers are. We apologise for this delay.

This copy shows the entry on 17-Sep-2019 at 02:00:40.

Location

The building or site itself may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.

County:
Staffordshire
District:
Lichfield (District Authority)
Parish:
Lichfield
National Grid Reference:
SK 10185 10060

Reasons for Designation

Around 6,000 moated sites are known in England. They consist of wide ditches, often or seasonally water-filled, partly or completely enclosing one or more islands of dry ground on which stood domestic or religious buildings. In some cases the islands were used for horticulture. The majority of moated sites served as prestigious aristocratic and seigneurial residences with the provision of a moat intended as a status symbol rather than a practical military defence. The peak period during which moated sites were built was between about 1250 and 1350 and by far the greatest concentration lies in central and eastern parts of England. However, moated sites were built throughout the medieval period, are widely scattered throughout England and exhibit a high level of diversity in their forms and sizes. They form a significant class of medieval monument and are important for the understanding of the distribution of wealth and status in the countryside. Many examples provide conditions favourable to the survival of organic remains.

The monument survives well and is a good example of a small medieval moated site. The site is unexcavated and remains unencumbered by modern development. It will contain evidence of the building known to have occupied the island during the 13th century.

Details

The monument is Maple Hayes medieval moated site. The site includes a rectangular island measuring c.30m by 27m upon which is a hollow some 0.6m square by 0.3m deep a short distance south of the centre. Surrounding the island is a dry moat 8-14m wide and up to 2m deep. An outer bank c.10m wide by 0.4m high flanks the eastern, southern, and southern half of the western sides. An 8m wide gap in the southern outer bank a little to the west of centre indicates an original access point to a bridge. A channel some 2m wide by 6m long and 0.3m deep exists at the mid-point of the monument's west side. The monument is considered to have been the seat of Thomas de Abbenhall in 1294.

MAP EXTRACT The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract. It includes a 3 metre boundary around the archaeological features, considered to be essential for the monument's support and preservation.

Legacy

The contents of this record have been generated from a legacy data system.

Legacy System number:
13507
Legacy System:
RSM

Sources

Other
Darvill, T., MPP Single Monument Class Descriptions - Moats, (1988)
SMR No 187, Staffs SMR, Abnalls Lane: Lichfield,
Snowdon, C A, AM 107, (1982)

Legal

This monument is scheduled under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 as amended as it appears to the Secretary of State to be of national importance. This entry is a copy, the original is held by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.

End of official listing

Your Contributions

Do you know more about this entry?

The following information has been contributed by users volunteering for our Enriching The List project. For small corrections to the List Entry please see our Minor Amendments procedure.

The information and images below are the opinion of the contributor, are not part of the official entry and do not represent the official position of Historic England. We have not checked that the contributions below are factually accurate. Please see our terms and conditions. If you wish to report an issue with a contribution or have a question please email [email protected].