Reasons for Designation
Tower houses are a type of defensible house particularly characteristic of the
borderlands of England and Scotland. Virtually every parish had at least one
of these buildings. At many sites the tower comprised only one element of a
larger house, with at least one wing being attached to it. These wings
provided further domestic accommodation, frequently including a large hall.
If it was incorporated within a larger domestic residence, the tower itself
could retain its defensible qualities and could be shut off from the rest of
the house in times of trouble. Tower houses were being constructed and used
from at least the 13th century to the end of the 16th century. They provided
prestigious defended houses permanently occupied by the wealthier or
aristocratic members of society. As such they were important centres of
medieval life. The need for such secure buildings relates to the unsettled
and frequently war-like conditions which prevailed in the Borders throughout
much of the medieval period. Around 200 examples of tower houses have been
identified of which over half were elements of larger houses. All surviving
tower houses retaining significant medieval remains will normally be
identified as nationally important.
Medieval rural settlements in England were marked by great regional diversity
in form, size and type, and the protection of their archaeological remains
needs to take these differences into account. To do this, England has been
divided into three broad Provinces on the basis of each area's distinctive
mixture of nucleated and dispersed settlements. These can be further divided
into sub-Provinces and local regions, possessing characteristics which have
gradually evolved during the last 1500 years or more.
The Tweed local region included the Kyloe Hills, the Till Valley and Milfield
Plain, as well as the rolling ridges of the Tweed Valley proper. Its
rectangular fields, low densities of dispersed farmsteads, tenant cottages and
estate villages all signify agrarian improvement in the 18th and 19th
centuries. Earthworks, usually in or near present villages, sometimes indicate
the earlier medieval farming communities which have been replaced.
Medieval villages were organised agricultural communities, sited at the centre
of a parish or township, that shared resources such as arable land, meadow and
woodland. Village plans varied enormously, but when they survive as earthworks
their most distinguishing features include roads and minor tracks, platforms
on which stood houses and other buildings such as barns, enclosed crofts and
small enclosed paddocks. They frequently included the parish church within
their boundaries, and as part of the manorial system most villages include one
or more manorial centres which may also survive as visible remains as well as
below ground deposits. In the central province of England, villages were the
most distinctive aspect of medieval life, and their archaeological remains are
one of the most important sources of understanding about rural life in the
five or more centuries following the Norman Conquest.
Most nucleated villages were surrounded by a series of unenclosed fields known
as an open field system. Open field systems originated before AD 1000 and
continued in use throughout the Middle Ages. However, recent work has shown
that some open field systems preserve the fossilized remains of earlier Roman
and prehistoric systems within their basic framework. From the late 16th
century, the open fields began to be enclosed by banks and hedges into the
more familiar fields of the present landscape. Formerly more extensive, open
field systems generally survive as fragments in association with medieval
settlements. They were the product of a communal system of farming in which
each tenant held a share oif a manor's arable and pasture land. The holdings
of each tenant were scattered across the open fields, the basic unit of
tenancy being the lande. Landes were parcelled together into larger groups
called furlongs, whose length and the number of landes they contained varied
greatly. Furlongs were grouped together into fields and an open field system
usually included several such fields. Systems of crop rotation were employed,
and these might be based on either the field or the furlong. The sides of the
furlongs were marked by baulks of unploughed land which often survive as low
banks and are known as furlong boundaries. The ends of the furlongs were
marked by headlands which survive as prominant earthen banks. Ploughmen used
the headlands as spaces on which to turn the teams of oxen or horses which
pulled the plough. Headlands were usually ploughed after work on the rest of
the furlong had been completed, though sometimes they were left unploughed and
along with the baulks between furlongs, provided access between furlongs. Such
unploughed areas were grazed by livestock. The most characteristic feature of
open field systems is ridge and furrow, a form of medieval cultivation
produced by the action of a heavy plough with a fixed mould board.
The medieval village of Abberwick is well preserved and retains significant
archaeological deposits. The village is a good example of its type which,
taken together with the remains of its open field system and the associated
tower house, will add greatly to our knowledge and understanding of medieval
settlement in the region.
Details
The monument includes the deserted remains of the medieval village of
Abberwick, the foundations of a tower house and a section of the surviving
open field system. The earliest documentary reference to the village at
Abberwick is contained in a document of 13th-century date where it was
recorded as a member of the barony of Wark on Tweed. In common with other
Northumberland villages, the population of the village fell between the end of
the 13th century and 1336, when there were only six individuals eligible to
pay taxes. The fall in population is usually attributed to devastation of
villages by the wars with Scotland, a series of failed harvests and the
effects of the Black Death. By the 17th century, the population had recovered
and 17 households are recorded, but by the early 18th century the village had
been depopulated and all but one of the farms were dispersed to other parts of
the township.
The remains of the village, the tower and its field system are visible as a
series of earthworks in the fields to the north, north east and west of the
modern farm of Abberwick. The most prominent feature is a raised rectangular
mound 12m by 7m standing to a height of 1.5m. Situated upon this mound there
are the foundations of a rectangular enclosure divided into two compartments
and visible as low earthen banks. This building is thought to be the remains
of a tower which was recorded at Abberwick in a document of 1572. Surrounding
the site of the tower are the foundations of other rectangular buildings
visible as low platforms, mounds and small enclosures. Associated with the
foundations of these buildings, and attached to some of them, are a
series of larger enclosures, interpreted as crofts or small allotments, which
are bounded by banks standing to a maximum of 1m high. A series of five larger
crofts situated immediately north of the modern farm of Abberwick contain the
well preserved remains of rig and furrow cultivation.
Surrounding the village part of the open field system farmed by its
inhabitants is visible. Immediately to the north there is a large furlong, or
field, with intact headlands; this furlong overlies an earlier feature which
is visible on aerial photographs and is interpreted as a former headland. To
the west of this furlong there are a series of smaller furlongs with intact
headlands and furlong boundaries. All of the furlongs contain extensive
remains of rig and furrow cultivation on average 8m wide between furrows and
standing to an average height of 0.3m.
All fences which cross the monument are excluded from the scheduling, although
the ground beneath these features is included.
MAP EXTRACT
The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.
