This browser is not fully supported by Historic England. Please update your browser to the latest version so that you get the best from our website.

Medieval settlement at Hartley Mauditt

List Entry Summary

This monument is scheduled under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 as amended as it appears to the Secretary of State to be of national importance. This entry is a copy, the original is held by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.

Name: Medieval settlement at Hartley Mauditt

List entry Number: 1016719


The monument may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.

County: Hampshire

District: East Hampshire

District Type: District Authority

Parish: Worldham

National Park: SOUTH DOWNS

Grade: Not applicable to this List entry.

Date first scheduled: 03-Nov-1958

Date of most recent amendment: 24-Nov-2000

Legacy System Information

The contents of this record have been generated from a legacy data system.

Legacy System: RSM

UID: 30277

Asset Groupings

This list entry does not comprise part of an Asset Grouping. Asset Groupings are not part of the official record but are added later for information.

List entry Description

Summary of Monument

Legacy Record - This information may be included in the List Entry Details.

Reasons for Designation

Medieval rural settlements in England were marked by great regional diversity in form, size and type, and the protection of their archaeological remains needs to take these differences into account. To do this, England has been divided into three broad Provinces on the basis of each area's distinctive mixture of nucleated and dispersed settlements. These can be further divided into sub-Provinces and local regions, possessing characteristics which have gradually evolved during the past 1500 years or more. This monument lies in the East Wessex sub-Province of the south-eastern Province, an area in which settlement characteristics are shaped by strong contrasts in terrain. This is seen in the division between the chalk Downs, where chains of nucleated settlements concentrate in the valleys, and the Hampshire Basin, still dominated by the woodlands and open commons of the ancient New Forest, where nucleated sites are largely absent. Along the coastal strip extending into Sussex are more nucleations, while in Hampshire some coastal areas and inland valleys are marked by high densities of dispersed settlement, much of it post-medieval. The Hampshire Downs and Salisbury Plain local region is a distinctive, large area with extremely low densities of dispersed settlement on the chalk, and dense strings of villages, hamlets and farmsteads concentrated in the valleys. Fieldwork has shown that these, together with associated earthworks, date from many periods, reflecting the long and complex history of settlement in these `preferred zones' within an area generally deficient in surface water.

Medieval villages were the organised agricultural communities, sited at the centre of a parish or township, that shared resources such as arable land, meadow and woodland. Village plans vary enormously, but when they survive as earthworks their most distinguishing features include roads and minor tracks, platforms on which stood houses and other buildings such as barns, enclosed crofts and small enclosed paddocks. In the central province of England, villages were the most distinctive aspect of medieval life, and their archaeological remains are one of the most important sources of understanding about rural life in the five or more centuries following the Norman Conquest. The remains of the abandoned medieval and later settlement at Hartley Mauditt survive well as a series of earthworks and buried deposits. Many areas of the settlement have remained largely undisturbed since their abandonment and the survival of archaeological deposits relating to their occupation and use is likely to be good. These deposits will contain information about the dating, layout and economy of the settlement, and together with contemporary documents relating to the village, will provide a good opportunity to understand the mechanisms behind its development, decline and eventual abandonment.


Legacy Record - This information may be included in the List Entry Details.


The monument includes the remains of the medieval settlement of Hartley Mauditt. The settlement lies on an Upper Greensand escarpment and is in two separate areas of protection situated either side of a sunken road. The road is orientated on a north to south axis and represents the principal throughfare through the village. A series of faint strip enclosures immediately to its west indicate the location of crofts, the house platforms associated with which are known to have originally lined either side of the road. A sub-circular depression up to 1m in depth immediately west of the church indicates the probable site of the manor house. Finds of stone and brick in the vicinity suggest that this was a substantial structure, and is almost certainly the location of a building depicted on a map of 1759, which probably replaced an earlier manor house. The building is not shown on a map dated 1840 and had evidently been demolished by this time. A series of platforms immediately south east of the church indicate the locations of further buildings, whilst an `L'-shaped depression approximately 38m east to west and 30m north to south adjacent to the stream probably represents a small moat or a pond. Trackways are visible within the western portion of the village as slight scarps or linear depressions, and the settlement was defined on its south western side by a hollow way up to 8m in width and 3.5m in depth which runs for 140m on a NNW-SSE axis. Referred to as `Herlege' in the Domesday survey of 1086 with a population of 19, a document dated to 1283 names 23 tenants within Hartley Mauditt. From the late 14th century onwards the manor is known to have become the property of the Duchy of Lancaster. In 1586 men from `Hartlye Mawditt' were implicated in a plot to fire the beacons around the Meon Valley to call attention to the lack of food. Three of them, a tailor, a husbandman and a weaver were subsequently arrested in Winchester. The precise reason for abandonment of the settlement is not known, but it is believed to have been through emparking. A survey dated to 1591 suggests that there were then 19 dwellings in the village. Whilst Hearth Tax returns for 1665 indicate that the number had increased to 23 by 1665, in 1673 it was 21 and by 1674 had declined further still to only 16. By 1759 Isaac Taylor's map describes the whole area of the settlement as Hartley Park, and depicts only one large building next to the church. All fences, footbridges, feed troughs and the modern surfaces of all path and trackways are excluded from the scheduling, although the ground beneath them is included.

MAP EXTRACT The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.

Selected Sources

Books and journals
Lewis, C, Medieval Settlement in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight Project, (1996)
Meirion-Jones, G I, 'Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club' in Dogmersfield and Hartley Mauditt: Two Deserted Villages, , Vol. XXVI, (1969)
Hampshire County Council, SU 73 NW 20,
Hanworth, J., AM12, (1979)
RCHME, NMR: SU 73 NW 30,

National Grid Reference: SU 74229 36149, SU 74318 36273


© Crown Copyright and database right 2018. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100024900.
© British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Limited 2018. All rights reserved. Licence number 102006.006.
Use of this data is subject to Terms and Conditions.

The above map is for quick reference purposes only and may not be to scale. For a copy of the full scale map, please see the attached PDF - 1016719 .pdf

The PDF will be generated from our live systems and may take a few minutes to download depending on how busy our servers are. We apologise for this delay.

This copy shows the entry on 21-Sep-2018 at 11:14:29.

End of official listing