This browser is not fully supported by Historic England. Please update your browser to the latest version so that you get the best from our website.

St Rumbold's Well

List Entry Summary

This monument is scheduled under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 as amended as it appears to the Secretary of State to be of national importance. This entry is a copy, the original is held by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

Name: St Rumbold's Well

List entry Number: 1017204

Location

The monument may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.

County: Buckinghamshire

District: Aylesbury Vale

District Type: District Authority

Parish: Buckingham

National Park: Not applicable to this List entry.

Grade: Not applicable to this List entry.

Date first scheduled: 11-Feb-2000

Date of most recent amendment: Not applicable to this List entry.

Legacy System Information

The contents of this record have been generated from a legacy data system.

Legacy System: RSM

UID: 29442

Asset Groupings

This list entry does not comprise part of an Asset Grouping. Asset Groupings are not part of the official record but are added later for information.

List entry Description

Summary of Monument

Legacy Record - This information may be included in the List Entry Details.

Reasons for Designation

Holy wells are water sources with specifically Christian associations. The custom of venerating springs and wells as sacred sites is also known to have characterised pre-Christian religions in Britain and, although Christian wells have been identified from as early as the 6th century AD, it is clear that some holy wells originated as earlier sacred sites. The cult of holy wells continued throughout the medieval period. Its condemnation at the time of the Reformation (c.1540) ended new foundations but local reverence and folklore customs at existing holy wells often continued, in some cases to the present day. The holy wells sometimes functioned as sites for baptism but they were also revered for less tangible reasons, some of which may have had origins in pre- Christian customs, such as folklore beliefs in the healing powers of the water and its capacity to effect a desired outcome for future events. Associated rituals often evolved, usually requiring the donation of an object or coin to retain the 'sympathy' of the well for the person seeking its benefits. At their simplest, holy wells may be unelaborated natural springs with associated religious traditions. Structural additions may include lined well shafts or conduit heads on springs, often with a tank to gather the water at the surface. The roofing of walled enclosures to protect the water source and define the sacred area created well houses which may be simple, unadorned small structures closely encompassing the water source, or larger buildings, decorated in the prevailing architectural style and facilitating access with features such as steps to the water source and open areas with stone benching where visitors might shelter. At their most elaborate, chapels, and sometimes churches, may have been built over the well or adjacent well house. The number of holy wells is not known but estimates suggest at least 600 nationally. They provide important information on the nature of religious beliefs and practices and on the relationship between religion and the landscape during the medieval period.

St Rumbold's Well is one of the principal features of the historic town of Buckingham, being the last visible feature of the cult of the saint which was instrumental in the development of the town's economy and position in the medieval period.

The structural remains of the early 17th century conduit house are of considerable interest in their own right, although the evidence of Speed's map and the longevity of the well as a place of pilgrimage, strongly suggests the presence of an earlier well house, the remains of which may well be buried beneath the later structure. The survival of a substantial length of the outflow leat (mapped in 1610) is particularly significant given its orientation towards the site of the earlier church and shrine, and the possibility that it also determined the pilgrim's route to the springhead. Ridge and furrow cultivation earthworks were created to facilitate drainage and the apportionment of land and are a characteristic feature of agricultural practice in the medieval period. The spatial relationship between the cultivation pattern and the site of St Rumbold's Well is of considerable importance, providing information regarding the medieval setting of the holy well and its longevity as a significant feature of the landscape.

History

Legacy Record - This information may be included in the List Entry Details.

Details

St Rumbold's Well is located to the south west of Buckingham, on the south side of the dismantled railway line which borders the town. In addition to the medieval well, the monument includes the remains of an early 17th century conduit house, the outflow leat which formerly led to the bow of the River Great Ouse which surrounds the southern part of the historic town and a sample of the medieval cultivation earthworks (ridge and furrow) which flank the well to the south.

The well, which is now dry for much of the year, was positioned to exploit the spring line below the crest of a north facing slope overlooking the town. It takes its name from St Rumbold, grandson of Penda, the seventh century pagan Anglo-Saxon king of Mercia. According to legend, Rumbold was baptised as a Christian in 626 and, in the three days leading to his death, preached, worked miracles and made preparations for his burial. The most mythological aspect of his legend is that all this took place in a single year, resulting in his occasional depiction as an infant in later canons. Although Rumbold's legend may well have been elaborated to support the spread of Christianity amongst the pagan kingdoms it took particular root in Buckingham, where he was eventually buried. The north aisle of the old parish church was dedicated to the saint and became a focus of pilgrimage in the 12th and 13th centuries. The sanctity of the well was not authorised by the Church, but provided a further attraction to pilgrims. This activity was censured in the late 13th century when Bishop Sutton of Lincoln, believing the saint's fabulous tale to be less than orthodox, issued an edict against the cult. All such cults and holy wells were condemned following the Reformation, and the former shrine was not transferred when Buckingham's parish church was relocated and rebuilt in 1777-8.

A small circular structure is depicted over the well head on John Speed's Map of the County of Buckingham (dated 1610), although the foundation courses surrounding the spring are those of a square masonry building. This single storey building stood until the early years of the 20th century and, according to the Royal Commission Inventory of 1912, displayed a date stone within a small arch flanked with pilasters on the east wall and was entered through a doorway beneath a four-centred arch to the north. A tile roof can be surmised from fragments present in the demolition debris piled around the well head. The building is known to have been a conduit house, built in 1623 by the Lambert family, who ran lead piping (examples stamped with the date `1619' have been found) from the well to Castle House, some 600m to the north east. The original overflow channel, which is marked on Speed's map, can still be seen as a slight declivity following the field margin to the north east flanked by lines of trees and hedgerow shrubs. It may be significant that this outflow follows an alignment directed towards the former medieval church on the far side of the river. The upper section of this channel is included in the scheduling. The lower part has been truncated by the railway embankment and overlain by housing and is not included in the scheduling.

The field to the south of the well is covered by low cultivation earthworks, the pattern of ridge and furrow running north to south and terminating in a headland (a cross-ploughed ridge) set parallel to the springhead and the outflow channel. The position of the headland indicates that the medieval field pattern developed after the well had become established. The headland is included in the scheduling together with a 5m wide sample of the cultivation earthworks to the south in order to protect this archaeological relationship.

MAP EXTRACT The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.

Selected Sources

Books and journals
Clarke, J, The Book of Buckingham, (1984)
Elliot, D J, Buckingham, (1975)
Hunt, J, Buckingham. A Pictorial History, (1997)
Lipscomb, G, The History and Antiquties of Buckinghamshire, (1847), 579-80
Page, W (ed), The Victoria History of the County of Buckinghamshire: Volume III, (1925), 487
Page, W , The Victoria History of the County of Buckinghamshire, (1925), 487
Royal Commission on Historical Monuments, , An Inventory of Historic Monuments in Buckinghamshire, (1912), 74
Vernon, M T, Bonner, D C, Buckingham. A History of a County Town, (1984), 14
Other
Information from local historian, Shirley, R, St Rumbold's Well, (1999)
Title: Map of Buckingham Source Date: 1610 Author: Publisher: Surveyor: Reproduced in Hunt's History of Bucks

National Grid Reference: SP 69004 33548

Map

Map
© Crown Copyright and database right 2017. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100024900.
© British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Limited 2017. All rights reserved. Licence number 102006.006.
Use of this data is subject to Terms and Conditions.

The above map is for quick reference purposes only and may not be to scale. For a copy of the full scale map, please see the attached PDF - 1017204 .pdf

The PDF will be generated from our live systems and may take a few minutes to download depending on how busy our servers are. We apologise for this delay.

This copy shows the entry on 21-Nov-2017 at 02:05:53.

End of official listing