Anglo-Saxon fortified centre at Eashing


Heritage Category:
Scheduled Monument
List Entry Number:
Date first listed:
Date of most recent amendment:


© Crown Copyright and database right 2020. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100024900.
© British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Limited 2020. All rights reserved. Licence number 102006.006.
Use of this data is subject to Terms and Conditions.

The above map is for quick reference purposes only and may not be to scale. For a copy of the full scale map, please see the attached PDF - 1017720.pdf

The PDF will be generated from our live systems and may take a few minutes to download depending on how busy our servers are. We apologise for this delay.

This copy shows the entry on 12-Aug-2020 at 01:58:44.


The building or site itself may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.

Guildford (District Authority)
National Grid Reference:
SU 94824 43756

Reasons for Designation

Anglo-Saxon centres, usually known as burhs, are defended urban areas that are characterised by a planned, ordered layout, sometimes including a regular grid of streets. They date mainly from the late ninth century AD, as King Alfred's response to the threat of Danish invasion. There are some earlier, eighth century examples in the kingdom of Mercia. They include large towns covering around 58ha, and smaller forts ranging in size from 1ha-9.5ha. Their defences are usually either restored Roman town walls or newly built earthen ramparts. Documentary evidence suggests that mints and markets were established in most of the larger centres. Many of the larger fortified centres now lie beneath modern cities or towns, but strong traces of their layout usually survive in the modern street plan. Most original buildings, including churches, dwellings and outbuildings, were simple timber structures, traces of which may survive in the form of fragile below ground features such as post holes, sill-beam slots and pits. Other contemporary features include water supply and drainage systems, burgage plot boundaries, middens and street furniture. A few of the smaller burghal forts were short-lived and have remained largely undisturbed by subsequent development since their abandonment. Fortified centres are a rare monument type with around 90 identified examples across southern, eastern and central England. The greatest concentration lies within the late Anglo-Saxon kingdoms of Wessex and Mercia, and they cluster in areas with favoured royal residences such as Somerset and Wiltshire. They are a comparatively well documented monument class, with 35 fortified centres of Wessex listed in the Burghal Hidage, a document which dates to the early tenth century AD. They are one of the earliest groups of planned medieval towns in western Europe. All examples with significant remains are considered to be of national importance.

The Anglo-Saxon fortified centre at Eashing survives well, and has remained largely free of subsequent development. It will therefore retain archaeological remains and environmental evidence relating to the construction and original use of the monument.


The monument includes a fortified centre, or burghal fort, situated within the Surrey Hills on a sandstone promontory which overlooks, and forms part of the eastern bank of, the River Wey. The fortified centre, which protected a contemporary river crossing superseded by the later medieval Eashing Bridge, survives in the form of earthworks and below ground archaeological features. It covers a roughly rectangular, north east-south west aligned area of approximately 8ha. The steeply-sloping ground on the western side of the monument precluded the need for substantial artificial defences, but a terraced walkway, affording views towards the bridge and the lower-lying land to the west, survives along the edge of the promontory. Visible traces of ramparts survive as a low, spread bank along the south eastern side of the monument. An engineered track which runs up from the bridge along the natural river cliff to the north western corner of the burh is interpreted as an original access route.

Buried traces of the church, dwellings, burgage plots and other buildings, structures and features associated with the original occupation of the fortifed centre, can be expected to survive within the interior. Past modern ploughing of the eastern part of the monument, and the construction of an electricity substation and two later houses and gardens, will have caused some disturbance to this area.

The fortified centre of Eashing (known originally as Escingum) is listed in the tenth century document known as the Burghal Hidage. The burh is believed to have been in use for a relatively short period, from around AD 880-930, when it was replaced as the regional centre by Guildford, 7km to the north east.

A number of features are excluded from the scheduling; these are Birdfield and Dean Cottage, the latter is Listed Grade II, their associated outbuildings, cesspits, garden furniture and ornaments, all modern field and garden boundaries, all gates, telegraph poles, the electricity substation and all road, hard-standing and path surfaces, although the ground beneath all these features is included.

MAP EXTRACT The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.


The contents of this record have been generated from a legacy data system.

Legacy System number:
Legacy System:


Books and journals
Aldsworth, F , 'Surrey Archaeological Collections' in The Burghal Hidage - Eashing, , Vol. 68, (1971), 199-201
Gower, M, 'Surrey Archaeological Collections' in The Late Saxon Burgh at Eashing, , Vol. 74, (1983), 225-226


This monument is scheduled under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 as amended as it appears to the Secretary of State to be of national importance. This entry is a copy, the original is held by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.

End of official listing

Your Contributions

Do you know more about this entry?

The following information has been contributed by users volunteering for our Enriching The List project. For small corrections to the List Entry please see our Minor Amendments procedure.

The information and images below are the opinion of the contributor, are not part of the official entry and do not represent the official position of Historic England. We have not checked that the contributions below are factually accurate. Please see our terms and conditions. If you wish to report an issue with a contribution or have a question please email [email protected].