Little Smeaton medieval village and rabbit warrens, immediately south east of Westhorpe Hall


Heritage Category: Scheduled Monument

List Entry Number: 1018690

Date first listed: 09-Oct-1981

Date of most recent amendment: 21-Jan-1999


Ordnance survey map of Little Smeaton medieval village and rabbit warrens, immediately south east of Westhorpe Hall
© Crown Copyright and database right 2019. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100024900.
© British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Limited 2019. All rights reserved. Licence number 102006.006.
Use of this data is subject to Terms and Conditions.

The above map is for quick reference purposes only and may not be to scale. For a copy of the full scale map, please see the attached PDF - 1018690 .pdf

The PDF will be generated from our live systems and may take a few minutes to download depending on how busy our servers are. We apologise for this delay.

This copy shows the entry on 18-Jan-2019 at 19:04:31.


The building or site itself may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.

County: North Yorkshire

District: Hambleton (District Authority)

Parish: Little Smeaton

National Grid Reference: NZ 34723 03305


Legacy Record - This information may be included in the List Entry Details.

Reasons for Designation

Medieval rural settlements in England were marked by great regional diversity in form, size and type, and the protection of their archaeological remains needs to take these differences into account. To do this, England has been divided into three broad Provinces on the basis of each area's distinctive mixture of nucleated and dispersed settlements. These can be further divided into sub-Provinces and local regions, possessing characteristics which have gradually evolved during the past 1500 years or more. The Northern Vale of York local region has been identified on two criteria. First, it contains low numbers of nucleations when compared with the rest of the sub-Province: village depopulation may partly account for this. Secondly, there are greater densities of dispersed settlement than is normal for the sub-Province, a phenomenon which cannot yet be fully explained.

Medieval villages were organised agricultural communities, sited at the centre of a parish or township, that shared resources such as arable land, meadow and woodland. Village plans varied enormously, but when they survive as earthworks their most distinguishing features include roads and minor tracks, platforms on which stood houses and other buildings such as barns, enclosed crofts and small enclosed paddocks. They frequently included the parish church within their boundaries, and as part of the manorial system most villages included one or more manorial centres which may survive also as visible remains as well as below ground deposits. In the central province of England, villages were the most distinctive aspect of rural life, and their archaeological remains are one of the most important sources of understanding about rural life in the five or more centuries following the Norman Conquest. Medieval villages were supported by a communal system of agriculture based on large, unenclosed open arable fields. These large fields were subdivided into strips (known as landes) which were allocated to individual tenants. The cultivation of these strips with heavy ploughs pulled by oxen-teams produced long, wide ridges, and the resultant `ridge and furrow' where it survives is the most obvious physical indication of the open field system. Individual strips or landes were laid out in groups known as furlongs defined by terminal headlands at the plough turning-points and lateral grass balks. Furlongs were in turn grouped into large open fields. Well-preserved ridge and furrow, especially in its original context adjacent to village earthworks, is both an important source of information about medieval agrarian life and a distinctive contribution to the character of the historic landscape. It is usually now covered by the hedges or walls of subsequent field enclosure. A warren is an area of land set aside for the breeding and management of rabbits or hares in order to provide a constant supply of fresh meat and skins. Although the hare is an indigenous species, the tradition of warren construction and use dates from the 12th century, following the introduction of rabbits into England from the continent. Warrens usually contain a number of purpose-built breeding places known as pillow mounds or rabbit buries, which were intended to centralise the colony and make catching the animals easier, whether using nets, ferrets or dogs. The mounds vary in design although rarely exceed 0.7m in height. Earlier monuments such as burial mounds, boundary features and mottes were sometimes reused as breeding places. The mounds are usually surrounded by ditches and contain underlying channels or are situated on sloping ground to facilitate drainage. The interior of the mound may also contain nesting places constructed of stone slabs or cut into the underlying subsoil or bedrock. A typical warren may contain between one and forty pillow mounds or rabbit buries and occupy an area up to appproximately 600ha. Many warrens were enclosed by a bank, hedge or wall intended to contain and protect the stock. Other features associated with the warren include vermin traps (usually a dead-fall mechanism within a small tunnel), and, more rarely, traps for the warren stock (known in Yorkshire as `types')which could contain the animals unharmed and allow for selective culling. Larger warrens might include living quarters for the warrener who kept charge of the site, sometimes surrounded by an enclosed garden and outbuildings. Early warrens were mostly associated with the higher levels of society, but soon spread in popularity so that by the 16th and 17th centuries they were a common feature on most manors and estates throughout the country. Warrens continued in use until fairly recent times, finally declining in the face of 19th and 20th century changes in agricultural practice, and the outbreak of myxomatosis. Warrens are found in all parts of England, the earliest examples lying in the south. Approximately 1,000-2,000 examples are known nationally with concentrations in upland areas, on heathland and in coastal zones. The profits from a successfully managed warren could be considerable and many areas in lowland England were set aside for warrens at the expense of agricultural land. Although relatively common, warrens are important for their associations with other classes of monument, including various forms of settlement, deer parks, field systems and fishponds. They may also provide evidence of the economy of both secular and ecclesiastical estates. All well preserved medieval examples are considered worthy of protection as will a sample of well preserved examples from a later date. The village of Little Smeaton survives well and significant remains of the domestic and economic development of the settlement will be preserved. The survival of the warren complex in a lowland agricultural setting is unusual, and important evidence of the form and function of the pillow mounds will be preserved. The warrens demonstrate a variety of forms, both enclosed and unenclosed, and thus preserve a developmental sequence. Taken together the village and warrens show the change in economic, agricultural and social conditions which led to the development from an agricultural village to an emparked landscape with warrening as the main landuse.


Legacy Record - This information may be included in the List Entry Details.


The monument includes the remains of the medieval village of Little Smeaton and a large complex of rabbit warrens and lies in the low lying land south of the River Tees, immediately south east of Westhorpe Hall. The village of Little Smeaton is recorded in the Domesday survey but by 1428 had fewer than ten households. The village was deserted sometime during the 15th century partly because of the ravages of the Black Death and also probably due to emparking and the change of land use to warrening. The visible remains of the village are preserved as substantial earthworks up to 2m high which occupy the northern two thirds of the field. The remains include a series of deep hollow ways crossing the monument with enclosures and building platforms dispersed amongst them. In the north east corner is a large enclosure with a raised central platform containing the remains of a building. Some sections of ridge and furrow are located to the east of the enclosure. In the southern third of the monument is the complex of warrens evident as low elongated mounds all orientated north to south and known as pillow mounds. To the west is a square enclosure formed by a bank 4m wide with an external ditch. Within this enclosure are two elongated round ended mounds 15m in length and 5m and 8m wide respectively. To the east of this is a second larger enclosure 100m in length. Part of both the west and east sides of this enclosure are formed by pillow mounds up to 30m in length. A further pillow mound lies in the centre of the enclosure. To the east of this enclosure is a steep ditch beyond which lies a further unenclosed pillow mound. Farther to the east is a line of discontinuous pillow mounds extending from the south east corner of the field for 55m. The warren complex thus contains both enclosed and unenclosed pillow mounds. All the pillow mounds are surrounded by ditches and the warren complex is separated from the village earthworks to the north by a wide ditch or hollow way extending east to west across the field. Further earthworks in this area, including a circular feature in the south of the central enclosure, are related to the warrening activity and will include structures such as a warreners hut and store room. The warrens probably date to after the abandonment of Little Smeaton and further remains of the village will lie beneath the warren features. All fences and gates are excluded from the scheduling, although the ground beneath these features is included.

MAP EXTRACT The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract. It includes a 2 metre boundary around the archaeological features, considered to be essential for the monument's support and preservation.


The contents of this record have been generated from a legacy data system.

Legacy System number: 31337

Legacy System: RSM


Books and journals
Grifiths, M, Medieval Villages of the Tees Lowlands, (1976)
CUC AQP 44, (1967)

End of official listing