Summary
A Romano-British regular aggregate field system with associated trackway, field entrances and field bank.
Reasons for Designation
The Mere End Down Romano-British field system, including its associated trackway and bank and an extension of the trackway to the north, are scheduled for the following principal reasons:
* Period: the regular aggregate field system and its associated features are representative of the Romano-British period and provide good evidence of the management and exploitation of this area at that time;
* Survival/rarity: the regular aggregate field system survives well and, being a rare type, there is a presumption in favour of designation when such features survive to any substantive degree; as is the case here;
* Fragility/vulnerability: these earthworks, although well managed and in pasture at the present time, could be destroyed by ploughing and the complexity of the relationship between the earthworks lost;
* Potential: there is potential for archaeological and environmental evidence to be retained in the lynchets and ditch fills;
* Diversity: the trackway and field entrances are recognised components of regular aggregate field systems.
History
Field systems represent the physical manifestation of farming, both animal husbandry and cultivation, from its prehistoric origins to the present day. The earliest examples may be identified from patterns of boundaries preserved in or buried beneath the modern landscape. Field systems exhibit an immense variety of forms depending on their age, purpose and the extent of later modifications.
There are a number of different types of prehistoric field system classified according to their form. The field system at Mere End Down belongs to the class known as regular aggregate or accreted field systems.
Regular aggregate or accreted field systems date from the Bronze Age (2000-700 BC) to the end of the fifth century AD. They usually cover areas of up to 100ha and comprise a discrete block of fields orientated in roughly the same direction, with the field boundaries laid out along two axes set at right angles to one another. Individual fields generally fall within the 0.1ha-3.2ha range and can be square, rectangular, long and narrow, triangular or polygonal in shape. The field boundaries can take various forms (including drystone walls or reaves, orthostats (walls composed of large irregular boulders), earth and rubble banks, pit alignments, ditches, fences and lynchets) and follow straight or sinuous courses. Component features common to most systems include entrances and trackways, and in some cases the settlements or farmsteads from which people utilised the fields over the years have been identified. These are usually situated close to or within the field system.
The development of field systems is seen as a response to the competition for land which began during the later prehistoric period. The majority are thought to have been used mainly for crop production, evidenced by the common occurrence of lynchets resulting from frequent ploughing, although rotation may also have been practised in a mixed farming economy. Regular aggregate or accreted field systems occur widely and have been recorded in southwestern and southeastern England, East Anglia, Cheshire, Cumbria, Nottinghamshire, North and South Yorkshire and Durham. They represent a coherent economic unit often utilised for long periods of time and can thus provide important information about developments in agricultural practises in a particular location and broader patterns of social, cultural and environmental change over several centuries.
The field system at Mere End Down, which is the only extant part of a larger system, has not been the subject of specific research, but has been mentioned in a number of studies relating to the wider landscape. It is noted by PP Rhodes in his article ‘The Celtic Field-Systems on the Berkshire Downs’ (1950, 1-28) where he remarks that the name ‘mere’, derived from the Anglo-Saxon ‘maere’, meaning ‘the baulk of a ploughland’. Excavations in Nut Wood, about 0.5km to the NW of the field system (Bowden, Ford & Mees 1991-3, 109-130), suggests that the field system around Mere End was established in the Roman period. An aerial photographic analysis (Winton, 2009) concerning the scheduled disc barrow on Mere End Down (NHLE entry 1006299), which lies 0.27km to the N of the field system mainly looks at that monument, but does note the wider field system including the area under consideration.
Details
PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS
A Romano-British regular aggregate field system with associated trackway and bank on a west facing slope on the Berkshire/Wessex Downs.
DESCRIPTION
The field system at Mere End Down is the only extant part of a larger system which surrounds it. The field system includes a series of lynchets running NW-SE from which transverse lynchets spring running NE-SW. The most prominent lynchets are those which run NW-SE since these are at right angles to the slope of the land and therefore received the greatest accumulation of soil creep during periods of ploughing. These major lynchets stand to about 1.3m high, and the largest of the transverse lynchets to about 1m high. The lynchets extend into the arable field to the W where ploughing has denuded them, but they can still be seen standing to about 0.3m high although much spread. None of the fields are of uniform size, but the fields in the E part of the system are in the range of about 75m by 100m; that part of the system under arable to the W appears from air photographs to be subdivided into smaller units of about 70m by 30m.
To the E of the lynchets is a ditch about 3m wide by 0.8m deep which is a trackway alongside the field system, and to its E a berm of about 8m wide with a bank 0.7m high beyond. This bank appears to be a lynchet associated with the adjacent part of the field system to the E. Travelling N the berm narrows as the track and lynchet come closer together. About halfway along its length the ditch dog-legs slightly to the W where there appears to be an entrance into one of the fields.
At its N end the ditch continues into the adjacent arable field. It cannot be seen on the ground, but is visible on air photographs and is recorded on the Ordnance Survey map as continuing for a further 142m N into the field. Although having been ploughed over the ditch will retain archaeological information and environmental evidence relating to the field system and the landscape in which it was constructed. On the Berkshire 1882 County Series of historic maps this ditch is shown to dog-leg (in a similar fashion to the section to the S) just to the N of the modern field boundary.
EXTENT OF SCHEDULING
The scheduled area covers an area 422m E-W by 673m N-S and for the most part follows the field boundaries depicted on the Ordnance Survey map or extensions of those boundaries. At its south side and on part of its west side the scheduled area abuts the county boundary with West Berkshire. At the north end of the monument the extension of the trackway within an arable field has a margin of protection of 15m on its W side where it is vulnerable to ploughing and to protect associated features such as field entrances and lynchet abutments.
All fences and drinking troughs are excluded from the scheduling but the ground beneath them is included.