Roman fort at The Lunt
List Entry Summary
This monument is scheduled under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 as amended as it appears to the Secretary of State to be of national importance. This entry is a copy, the original is held by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.
Name: Roman fort at The Lunt
List entry Number: 1017245
The monument may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.
District Type: District Authority
National Park: Not applicable to this List entry.
Grade: Not applicable to this List entry.
Date first scheduled: 14-Jun-1962
Date of most recent amendment: 03-Jul-2000
Legacy System Information
The contents of this record have been generated from a legacy data system.
Legacy System: RSM
This list entry does not comprise part of an Asset Grouping. Asset Groupings are not part of the official record but are added later for information.
List entry Description
Summary of Monument
Legacy Record - This information may be included in the List Entry Details.
Reasons for Designation
Roman forts served as permanent bases for auxiliary units of the Roman Army.
In outline they were straight sided rectangular enclosures with rounded
corners, defined by a single rampart of turf, puddled clay or earth with one
or more outer ditches. Some forts had separately defended, subsidiary
enclosures or annexes, allowing additional storage space or for the
accommodation of troops and convoys in transit. Although built and used
throughout the Roman period, the majority of forts were constructed between
the mid first and mid second centuries AD. Some were only used for short
periods of time but others were occupied for extended periods on a more or
less permanent basis. In the earlier forts, timber was used for gateways,
towers and breastworks. From the beginning of the second century AD there was
a gradual replacement of timber with stone.
Roman forts are rare nationally and are extremely rare south of the Severn
Trent line. As one of a small group of Roman military monuments, which are
important in representing army strategy and therefore government policy, forts
are of particular significance to our understanding of the period. All Roman
forts with surviving archaeological potential are considered to be nationally
As well as being an unusual survival beyond the expected geographic distribution of Roman forts, the Roman fort at The Lunt is of particular interest in having been shown by excavation to be unusual in both its layout and the buildings it contained. The fort does not conform to the strictly symmetrical plan of many Roman forts and its form may provide evidence for the strategy uderlying the choice and use of particular locations. The unusually high number of granaries, stables and horse harness fittings discovered in addition to the `gyrus', or horse schooling ring, support the interpretation that the fort housed an `Ala quingenaria' or 500 strong cavalry unit. Among the known Roman forts, cavalry forts are less well represented and the particular features associated with this fort will add considerably to our knowledge of these types of fort and the methods of deployment of cavalry among the Roman army.
In addition, excavations have shown that there is good archaeological preservation of a number of dateable phases of development of the fort, providing evidence for methods of construction and building materials throughout the Roman period. These developments appear to tie in well with known historical events and national military campaigns and will provide us with insights into the effect of national events on local military stations. Excavations have also shown that the fort preserves environmental deposits, such as pollen, grain and food remains which will inform us about the diet and living conditions of the occupants of the fort as well as the natural environment and agricultural regimes on the land surrounding the fort.
Legacy Record - This information may be included in the List Entry Details.
The monument includes the earthwork and buried remains of a Roman fort located
on a plateau sloping gently on the east and west sides above `The Lunt', a
steep escarpment immediately south of the River Sowe.
Since the 1960s the fort has been the subject of excavations led by Coventry Museum service, and some of its main features, such as earth ramparts and timber buildings have been reconstructed and laid out for public presentation. Excavations at the fort have confirmed three main phases of activity, beginning with its construction in AD 60-64.
The fort appears to lie in the centre of the line of defences along the Fosse Way, however dating evidence has suggested that it was constructed long after that part of the Fosse frontier had been abandoned, possibly in the aftermath of the Boudiccan Revolt when its garrison may have been part of the force used to quell any remaining local unrest.
During its lifetime the fort was altered and developed until being abandoned and systematically demolished, by levelling of the ramparts and infilling of the ditches in order to prevent reuse. The garrison is believed to have been redeployed to assist in Agricola's northern campaigns.
The earliest fort on the site was defended by a bank and ditch on its northern and western sides. Evidence for defences has been found to the south and east, and it is believed that in this period the very marshy ground in these areas provided adequate protection. Within the area defined by these defences, a series of barrack blocks, storehouses and officers quarters were constructed on raised wooden floors. Within the fort site remains of timber buildings include a number of barrack blocks and granaries, as well as the pincipia or main administration block which includes a regimental shrine and officers quarters. Many of the buildings show signs of having been rebuilt at least once. There were also many rubbish and latrine pits and wells, and a number of bread ovens inserted into the ramparts. Finds from the fort include pottery, coins and metalware which have helped to date the successive phases of construction and development of the site.
During the second phase, this internal arrangement of accommodation was later rebuilt on a different alignment when a large circular enclosure some 30m in diameter was constructed. This enclosure is considered to be a `gyrus' or `horse schooling ring' which, combined with the evidence for stables and the large number of horse fittings recorded by excavation, supports the belief that the garrison of the fort included a large cavalry contingent. Sinuous defences were constructed to the east and south accommodating the gyrus on these sides.
In the third and final phase the southern boundary was moved northwards, reducing the area of the fort from 1.2ha to 1ha. A watching brief during development to the south of the monument in the gardens of a bungalow located beam slots of Roman origin suggesting that occupation originally extended to the south beyond the modern road.
There is evidence during the later third century for further use of the site although there is little evidence for occupation, suggesting that the site was used for only a very short period, or that it was used as a stock enclosure.
Traces of medieval ridge and furrow cultivation remains demonstrate that the site was partly under agriculture during the medieval period. In addition, up to six medieval hearths associated with metal smelting were located during excavations, and recent work has suggested that a number of ditches on the west side of the fort are of medieval date.
The reconstructed buildings and all modern surfaces are excluded from the scheduling, although the ground beneath them is included.
MAP EXTRACT The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.
Books and journals
'TBAS' in A Neronian vespasianic military site, (1975), 67-85
Barrett, AA , Lunt Roman Fort interim report on excavations western defences, 1997, unpublished excavation report
various SMR Officers, Various unpublished notes in SMR, Warwick SMR 2673
National Grid Reference: SP 34415 75158
The above map is for quick reference purposes only and may not be to scale. For a copy of the full scale map, please see the attached PDF - 1017245 .pdf
The PDF will be generated from our live systems and may take a few minutes to download depending on how busy our servers are. We apologise for this delay.
This copy shows the entry on 22-Sep-2018 at 10:02:09.
End of official listing