Holloway Prison and the Fight for Freedom
More than 300 suffragettes were incarcerated at Holloway prison during the early 20th century in one of the darker aspects of the campaign for the vote for women, and one that has historical and contemporary resonance for the women’s liberation movement.
Built in 1852, Holloway prison became a female-only site in 1903. The building, an imposing castellated structure whose entrance was flanked by huge griffins holding keys in their claws, covered 10 acres of land in north London. Six wings radiated from a central tower, allowing for accommodation for 435 prisoners.
After the suffrage movement turned militant and women were arrested for acts of vandalism and sabotage, Holloway became a focal point of the struggle.
Women behind bars
At one time or other most of the prominent suffragettes spent time at Holloway, including Christabel Pankhurst after she was arrested with Annie Kenny in 1905 for interrupting a Liberal Party rally to demand votes for women.
In 1906 her sister Sylvia Pankhurst was imprisoned after starting a protest at the House of Commons, and their mother Emmeline Pankhurst also served time there.
Many accounts have highlighted the presence of middle-class suffragettes at Holloway, but dozens of working-class women were incarcerated. Ethel Smyth wrote that she found,
Neither were the suffragettes all young, single and childless; grandmothers and young mothers and wives were among the inmates. Personal testimonies point to solidarity among the women, despite their different backgrounds. All the suffragettes were supposed to receive preferential treatment to "common criminals", but women were generally treated according to their social class.
Jailed for printing an extract from the bill of rights on the walls of St Stephen’s Hall, artist Marion Wallace Dunlop was the first inmate to go on hunger strike in July 1909 to protest against conditions. As hunger strikes spread among the suffragettes, the Prison Commission responded with a regime of forcible feeding.
Some women were force fed more than 200 times. Among the many harrowing testimonies about the regime, Emmeline Pankhurst wrote:
‘Cat and Mouse Act’
The forcible feeding was in part motivated by the government’s fears that a suffragette - especially a well-connected one – might fall ill and die. In 1913 the government introduced what became known as the 'Cat and Mouse Act', which permitted hunger-striking women to be released into the community only for them to be rearrested once they had regained their health.
Poorer women often had it harder at Holloway. This is borne out by Constance Lytton, daughter of Lord Lytton, who was jailed twice in 1909 after protesting at the House of Commons and claimed to have received worse treatment when she posed as a working-class seamstress than when her true identity was known.
Written on the skin
Lytton was also known for her attempt to mutilate her body for 'the cause'. Her plan was detected when she asked for dressings to avoid blood poisoning. In Prisons and Prisoners, she wrote:
A hold on history
Holloway became a magnet for supporters of the suffrage movement, who held noisy protests outside and communicated with inmates from the roof of a safe house in nearby Dalmeny Avenue. In 2013 they set off two bombs outside. On release, a suffragette was taken to the nearby safe house and might receive a hunger striker medal or Holloway brooch, designed by Sylvia Pankhurst and featuring the House of Commons portcullis, convict’s arrow and hanging chains.
The prison has long been linked to the women’s liberation movement and modern-day feminists have claimed it as a proud part of their history. The future of the site has been contentious since the prison closed in 2016, as activists seek to secure its feminist heritage for future generations. Campaign group Sisters Uncut has occupied the derelict space to demand services for victims of domestic violence.
Also of interest...
Our campaign to uncover the histories and places that tell the story of women's suffrage and gender equality.