A reconstruction image of Stonehenge seen from above at the time of the winter solstice with the sun casting long shadows of the stones.
A reconstruction of the winter solstice sunset at Stonehenge when the monument was complete. © Historic England Archive. Image reference IC095/074.
A reconstruction of the winter solstice sunset at Stonehenge when the monument was complete. © Historic England Archive. Image reference IC095/074.

Astronomical Research at Stonehenge

Investigating prehistoric monuments in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and their relationships to the heavens.

Introduction

Stonehenge is often described as mysterious and impossible to understand. An example of this is that its relationship to the skies and heavenly bodies is often misunderstood, even sometimes by archaeologists. Perhaps this is because archaeoastronomy – the study of how ancient people understood phenomena in the sky and how they used this sky-knowledge in their cultures – is rarely taught in the UK. However, most archaeologists and indeed the general public are aware that there is a link between the summer solstice and Stonehenge, although many would be hard-pressed to elaborate further.

Certain monuments were designed to view heavenly bodies at certain times of the year.

This combination of apparent mystery and a lack of detailed knowledge has led to some eye-watering claims about Stonehenge in the past: “it was a computer”, “it was built by aliens”, and so on. New studies of the landscape context of Stonehenge and a number of nearby monuments, and firming up the dates for these prehistoric structures, have cut through some of this confusion. They have established that certain monuments were designed to view heavenly bodies at certain times of the year.

This article is based on research in a lavishly illustrated new book by Ruggles and Chadburn, published by Liverpool University Press for Historic England on May 8th 2024. We would like to thank Historic England for commissioning and publishing the book, for providing our expert illustrator Sharon Soutar, and for funding the dating programme for Woodhenge. Wiltshire Museum kindly provided the material to do this.

We are pleased to offer Historic England Research Magazine readers a discount code: 27HERESEARCH, for this book. Enter the code at Liverpool University Press checkout to receive an extra 10% off the Liverpool University press website price (which is itself currently 20% off the Recommended Retail Price) making a reduction of 30% in total.

Solar alignments at Stonehenge

In 1720, the antiquarian William Stukeley first noticed that the architecture of Stonehenge related to the sun, famously noting that the axis of the monument was aligned upon the midsummer sunrise. Looking the opposite way, one can see that the solar alignment also works in that direction, as the midwinter setting sun is also framed by the stones. Standing at a fixed point, the solstice suns always rise or set each year at exactly the same points in the landscape, a phenomenon visible for a few days around each solstice.

Stonehenge’s architecture was designed to allow views of the exact points where the summer and winter solstice suns appear or disappear on the horizon.

Stonehenge’s architecture was designed to allow views of the exact points where the summer and winter solstice suns appear or disappear on the horizon. It is a monument designed to sight the sun. Today, many archaeologists think that the winter solstice was the more important of the two solstices for its prehistoric builders, and this axis and view is now marked by a large metal arrow for visitors.

The moon and Stonehenge

As well as the sun, it is likely that the moon was also important to the builders of Stonehenge.

As well as the sun, it is likely that the moon was also important to the builders of Stonehenge. The monument’s relationship to the moon, however, is much more difficult to prove. Unlike the sun which has an annual solstice, the moon’s ‘lunistice’ positions (reached every 27 days) themselves vary and are at their furthest apart in the landscape around every 19th year (a time known as the major lunar standstill).

A rectangle of much smaller stones known as the Station Stones is positioned outside the stone circle, near to the henge earthworks (see illustration above) and the long sides of the rectangle are broadly aligned with the most southerly moonrise and the most northerly moonset.

We believe that this was deliberate. It is currently the major lunar standstill season, so we are researching and observing the moon at Stonehenge during this critical time. It should be noted that the Station Stones rectangle is also aligned (along its short sides) with the solar axis which we have noted above.

Stonehenge and other astronomical monuments

New research has established the exact positions of the rising and setting sun and moon positions in the landscape surrounding Stonehenge in prehistory.

Using computer modelling and field observations, our new research has established the exact positions of the rising and setting sun and moon positions in the landscape surrounding Stonehenge in prehistory, taking into account the slightly different position of the sun and moon in 2500 BC, the approximate date when the stones were erected at Stonehenge. This means we now know how far their views or sightlines stretched, which allows us to understand the prehistoric landscape rather better.

However, as well as Stonehenge, there are a number of other nearby monuments which precisely frame views of the sun at the solstices, including Woodhenge, the Southern Circle at Durrington Walls and a timber row at Lark Hill, and we have done similar calculations for them. It is clear that even distant horizons were important to the monument builders – the longest sightline is nearly 15 kilometres long (this is the view from Stonehenge to the most northerly moonset on the ridge at Gibbet Knoll, near Market Lavington).

Reconstructing ancient sun-sighting monuments in their landscapes

We have pulled together various data sets to precisely reconstruct astronomical views which are now impossible to see.

We have pulled together various data sets to precisely reconstruct astronomical views which are now impossible to see. One example is at Durrington Walls henge, where the remains of the Southern Circle timber monument within it are now buried meters below ground, partly under a huge road embankment. The view from the centre of the Southern Circle, out through its entrance posts and down its Avenue toward the rising winter solstice sun, has been digitally reconstructed here. Data from two excavations, one in the 1960s and one in 2005-2006, and terrain modelling and calculations of the sun’s position in 2500 BC have been combined to reconstruct this view with a high degree of accuracy.

Dating Woodhenge

Critical to our understanding of these astronomical monuments is the date at which they were built. Unlike Stonehenge, Woodhenge was not well dated, but there was plenty of excavated material suitable for a dating programme in Wiltshire Museum. Charcoal from the timber rings, excavated nearly 100 years ago by the archaeologist Maud Cunnington, and antler picks discovered in later excavations of the ditch were all used. The results show that the oval timber rings – the astronomical monument aligned on the sun – were erected around 2600 BC but that the surrounding henge earthworks were constructed around 200 years later. This perhaps explains why the henge entrance is not aligned with the sun, ie because the monument was no longer used for astronomical purposes.

Impact of the research

We now know that the prehistoric builders incorporated distant views into the architecture of their monuments, and that these views framed the “targets” of the sun and moon at particular times of their cycles. These precise views are extremely rare for the British Neolithic, but there appears to be an unusual concentration of them in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site at 2500 BC. This research with new techniques has raised new questions as well as revisiting some old ones:

  • Why this area and not others?
  • Why was sighting the sun important at this time?
  • What did it mean to the monument builders?
  • Did they manage the surrounding landscape?
  • Were these people different from other nearby groups?

Further information

About the authors
Name and role
Name

Amanda Chadburn

Title and organisation
Archaeologist and Heritage Consultant
Details
Description
Amanda is an archaeologist and heritage adviser. She worked for over 35 years in English Heritage/ Historic England until retiring in 2022, holding various positions including Lead Adviser, Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site when she was responsible for the World Heritage Team. She currently undertakes heritage consultancy and teaches archaeology and heritage management at Oxford University. She is a Visiting Fellow in archaeology at Bournemouth University. As well as her own research, she undertakes voluntary work in the sector and sits on numerous committees and charities. She was elected as a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London in 1999, as a Corresponding Member of the German Archaeological Institute (DAI) in 2009, and as a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland in 2023.
Name and role
Name

Clive Ruggles

Title and organisation
Emeritus Professor of Archaeoastronomy at University of Leicester
Details
Description
As Emeritus Professor of Archaeoastronomy at the University of Leicester, Clive has spent a lifetime investigating ancient people’s perceptions of the sky and the uses they make of what they see there. Archaeoastronomy is an interdisciplinary field prone to misinterpretation and speculation and Clive's particular concern is to find the best ways to combine approaches from “hard science” and anthropology in order to reach sensible and robust conclusions. In 2017 he was awarded the Royal Astronomical Society’s Agnes Mary Clerke Medal for a “lifetime of distinguished work in the overlapping areas of archaeology, astronomy and the history of science". He is also a former President of the Prehistoric Society. While much of Clive's career has focused on Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain and Ireland, studying the design, landscape setting and orientation of ancient buildings and monuments in relation to the sky, he has also worked extensively on Hawaiian and Pacific star knowledge and in Peru, where in 2005 he co-discovered the 2200-year-old monumental solar observatory at Chankillo, which became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2021.

Download Issue 27 of Historic England Research as a PDF magazine

You can download this article and the other articles in this issue as a PDF format magazine.