Battle of Evesham 1265


Heritage Category:
List Entry Number:
Date first listed:
Location Description:


© Crown Copyright and database right 2021. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100024900.
© British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Limited 2021. All rights reserved. Licence number 102006.006.
Use of this data is subject to Terms and Conditions.

The above map is for quick reference purposes only and may not be to scale. For a copy of the full scale map, please see the attached PDF - 1000010.pdf

The PDF will be generated from our live systems and may take a few minutes to download depending on how busy our servers are. We apologise for this delay.

This copy shows the entry on 27-Feb-2021 at 22:37:30.


The building or site itself may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.

Location Description:
Wychavon (District Authority)
Wychavon (District Authority)
Norton and Lenchwick
National Grid Reference:
SP 03898 45662



King Henry III, in his efforts to subdue the reforms springing from the Provisions of Oxford of 1258, provoked a baronial faction led by Simon de Montfort, Earl of Leicester, to the extent that civil war was only a matter of time. The Battle of Lewes (1264) had ended with negotiations which gave Simon and the Barons increased power, but the deciding factor in the struggle between reform and absolute monarchy had to wait until the Battle of Evesham in August 1265.

On 4 August, Simon de Montfort's army of 6,000 men was trapped in Evesham by a Royal army of 8,000 under Prince Edward (the future Edward I) and the Earl of Gloucester. Simon had no choice but to fight his way out. He deployed his army as a single column and charged at the junction between Edward's and Gloucester's troops on Green Hill. It was a desperate tactic, which might have succeeded, had not the cavalry wings of the Royal army swung in on de Montfort's flanks. Although the Baronial army continued to resist for some hours, the battle became a progressively bloody massacre. Both Simon and his son Henry were killed, along with some 4,000 of his soldiers.

Their field army had been destroyed, but nonetheless the surviving Barons still held their castles and the war against the King dragged on until 1267. Complete reconciliation came only 1275, when the best elements of the Provisions of Oxford were encapsulated in the Statute of Westminster. Through the actions of de Montfort and the Barons, the die was cast for the role of Parliament as adviser to the monarch, a tradition which can be traced through to present times.

AMENITY FEATURES The battlefield locality features two nineteenth century monuments to the battle, Leicester Tower and an obelisk, neither of which is accessible at present. A public footpath links the old A435 and the Worcester road, and from this path south of Abbey Manor Farm a view of the heart of the battlefield can be gained.

OTHER DESIGNATIONS The battlefield area is subject to local plan policies BC1, CB23, H8 and EC7, all of which constrain development beyond its current extent.

KEY SOURCES Cox, D C, 1988, The Battle of Evesham. A New Account The Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough, ed. H Rothwell, (London 1967)

This list entry was subject to a Minor Amendment to the Selected Sources on 10/04/2019


The contents of this record have been generated from a legacy data system.

Legacy System number:
Legacy System:


English Heritage Battlefield Report: Battle of Evesham 1265 (Published 1995), accessed 10th April 2019 from


This battlefield is registered within the Register of Historic Battlefields by Historic England for its special historic interest.

End of official listing

Your Contributions

Do you know more about this entry?

The following information has been contributed by users volunteering for our Enriching The List project. For small corrections to the List Entry please see our Minor Amendments procedure.

The information and images below are the opinion of the contributor, are not part of the official entry and do not represent the official position of Historic England. We have not checked that the contributions below are factually accurate. Please see our terms and conditions. If you wish to report an issue with a contribution or have a question please email [email protected].